HEBREW WORD STUDY SWADDLING עזרורא CLOTHES

Transcription

1 HEBREW WORD STUDY SWADDLING עזרורא CLOTHES Luke 2:7, And she brought forth her firstborn son, and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger; because there was no room for them in the inn. Ezekiel 16:3-4, And say, Thus saith the Lord GOD unto Jerusalem; Thy birth and thy nativity [is] of the land of Canaan; thy father [was] an Amorite, and thy mother an Hittite. And [as for] thy nativity, in the day thou wast born thy navel was not cut, neither wast thou washed in water to supple [thee]; thou wast not salted at all, nor swaddled at all. Only Luke talks about Jesus being wrapped in swaddling clothes. Had it not been for this passage in Luke most of us would never have heard of the practice of wrapping a baby in swaddling clothes. This was a practice which would eventually die away around the sixteenth century as it was considered

2 either too barbaric or that it really served no practical purpose at all. It was just a tradition that continued for no other reason than the fact it was tradition. It is even believed by many medical specialists to be harmful to the child. I know as a child I would hear this utterly strange expression, swaddling clothes. It was an expression that was never used at any time except when we would hear the Christmas story and I would wonder what the blazes are swaddling clothes. The usual answer was that it was just a Bible term for blankets or diapers. Swaddling clothes in the Aramaic is azrura which really means a bandage. The Greek word that is used is esparganosen which is the Greek word for a bandage. We have the word swaddling used in Ezekiel 16:3. The Hebrew word used here is chatal which is the Hebrew word for a bandage. I believe it is safe to say that this was more than just a diaper or a blanket. The practice of swaddling is very ancient practice. It is believed to have been devised around the Paleolithic times about 4500 years ago during the Bronze Age around 2600 BC. Archaeologists have uncovered little models of babies wrapped in swaddling clothes dating back to this period. After an infant was born the umbilical cord was cut and tied. In this case, as there was no midwife, either Mary or Joseph would have had to do this. They would then sprinkle the baby with a powder made of dried myrtle leaves. Then they would gently rub the baby s skin with a very small amount of salt that has been finely grounded into a sort of mortar. It was believed this would make his or her flesh firm. For young Jewish parents this represented a testimony that that the parents would raise the child to be truthful and faithful. The swaddling clothes was a square yard of cloth which had a narrow band attached at one corner. The mother would wrap the

3 child in this swaddle with its arms close to its body and its legs stretched out. She would then wind the narrow band around the body from the shoulders to the ankles until the poor little beggar looked like an Egyptian mummy. This little ritual was performed as often as we would change a diaper today and would be done until the child was potty trained. In a practical sense it was meant to help the bodies grow strong and firm. It is interesting that today medical science has learned that it is best to just leave the poor chap alone, that he will develop naturally without artificial help. It took four thousand years for man to realize that God did a perfectly fine job creating the human creature without artificial intervention. To the Jewish parent, however, this practice carried symbolic meaning, of course every practice in Judaism carries some symbolism. This was a sign to the parents that they would teach the child to become honest, straightforward, and freed from crookedness. This brings up the question as to why Luke felt it was important to mention this, not once, but two times, again is verse 12 where the angel tells the shepherds that the child will be found wrapped in swaddling clothes. I mean, big whip, if every baby is wrapped in swaddling clothes just how were the shepherds able to use that to distinguish Jesus from any other baby coming down the pike. That is like going into an Amish community and asking to speak to Mr. Miller. Odds are every other male is a Mr. Miller. Some say that Luke mentioned this because he was a physician and thus concerned for these details. Obvious, he was nothing close to the skills, education and training of a physician today and it is a very poor comparison indeed. Colossians 4:14 called him the beloved physician in our English versions. The Greek word used is iatros which most your lexicons will say means physician. Although the practice of medicine existed in the first century it was not the skill,

4 education nor training of a physician we have and think of today. The Aramaic word used in Colossians 4:14 is assia which is really a healer. An assia is not a surgeon, physician nor a dispenser of medicine as was practiced during this time among the Greeks and Romans. An assia was more of a chiropractor who adjusted joints and dislocated bones. He would have been a practitioner of a holistic form of healing. Such practices were professions that were handed down from father to son with no formal medical training nor did they depend upon the practice for a living. So I doubt very much that Luke mentioned the swaddling from a professional stand point. More likely he mentioned it from the standpoint of a practitioner of spiritual values rather than medical skills. Luke would have been familiar with the passage in Ezekiel 16:4 where the prophet refers to this custom in his prophecy. In Ezekiel 16 the prophet is speaking out against the citizens of Jerusalem who were unfaithful to God and His commandments and uses the symbolic reference of washing, salting and swaddling. The failure to perform this tradition was symbolic of disloyalty and unfaithfulness to God. The term swaddling clothes to the Semitic mind was expressing the idea of loyalty and faithfulness to God. Thus, Luke wanted to make sure that this child that was born was not only the Son of God but a Son who would be loyal and faithful to Heavenly Father. So loyal and faithful in fact that He would be one with the Heavenly Father.

5 WORD STUDY I BELONG TO JEHOVAH Job 1:20-22: Then Job arose and tore his robe and shaved his head and he fell to the ground and worshipped. And he said naked I came from my mother s womb and naked I shall return there. The Lord gave and the Lord has taken away. Blessed be the name of the Lord. Through all this Job not sin nor did he blame God. Job did what people did in those days when they were in mourning. He tore his robe, shaved his head and fell to the ground. He deeply felt his loss. But he did one other thing, he worshipped, (shachah). In an earlier study I showed that this is a word also used for swimming, being surrounded by water. The enemy was able to take his possessions, his wealth, his status and his family away from him, but there was one thing the enemy could not touch, the love of God. When he was surrounded by the Love of God, knowing God s heart, he was able to say: The Lord gives and the Lord takes away. But just before that he says: Naked I came from my mother s womb, naked I shall return there. This is written in poetic style and would explain the rather strange word used

6 here for there. It is the word shamah. This is the same root as the word for heaven or the dwelling place of God. The Shin, Mem and Hei expresses the idea of being made complete in the revealed knowledge of God and His presence. The word return is shuv and this is a return in the sense of restoration. What Job may actually be saying here is Just as in my mother s womb I had need of nothing so too with nothing I am returning or being restored to the dwelling place of God. Most translators will translate the next phrase as Blessed be the name of the Lord. Yet the word blessed is yahi. This has many possibilities for translation. Yahi is sometimes used for Jehovah. It s basic meaning is I am. You could translate it as The name of Jehovah shall be. However, yahi has the sense of belonging and I believe in this context the best rendering would be. I belong to Jehovah. That would be a nice slap in the enemies face. I can lose everything, but I still belong to Jehovah or I am still Jehovah s property. In all this Job did not sin. The word for sin is chatak which means sin, or missing the mark, but it also means suffering no loss. No translator is going to translate this as suffering no loss because it is a complete contradiction to the story where Job lost everything. Or is it? The Apostle Paul came from a background of wealth. He was a member of the Sanhedrin, one of the 70 elite to sit on the high Jewish court. To be a member he had to be married. Yet, after he met Jesus we find him in near poverty, living off the

7 generosity of other believers, single, no longer a supreme court justice, disgraced and suffering physical affliction. Like old Job got wiped out, Paul got wiped out, for just simply accepting Jesus as his Messiah. Note what he says in Romans 8:38-39: For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing shall be able to separate us from the Love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. As long as he has the Love of God through Jesus Christ his Lord, he really didn t lose anything. Like Job, he could enter that shachah and just be surrounded by the presence and love of God and nothing else mattered. In seems like so many Christians have been under attack the last few years and faced losses like Job and Paul. They have lost jobs, their savings, the stress is tearing their families apart, many are losing their homes in foreclosure and there is not one of us who within 24 hours could not be in the same mix. Man and the enemy can take away our jobs, our homes, our families, our finances just like Job and Paul, but there is one thing they can not touch, there is one thing that no person, spiritual power, situation, circumstance, government etc. can take away from us, and that is the Love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord. If we have that, like Job and Paul we will not chatak, suffer a loss.